قرآنِ مجید میں حضرت موسیٰؑ کے مکالمات کی دعوتی حکمتِ عملی: معاصر دعوتی چیلنجز کے تناظر میں ایک تجزیاتی مطالعہ
PROPHETIC DA'WAH STRATEGY IN THE DIALOGUES OF PROPHET MUSA (AS) IN THE HOLY QURAN: AN ANALYTICAL STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71146/kjmr908Keywords:
Prophet Musa (AS), Da'wah Strategy, Quranic Dialogues, Contemporary Challenges, Pharaoh, Atheism, Materialism, Rational Discourse, Islamic CommunicationAbstract
The story of Prophet Musa (AS) in the Holy Qur'an provides a comprehensive model of the call to the truth (da'wah) in the face of institutionalised tyranny and intellectual hubris. This study examines the communicative and strategic aspects of the dialogues of Prophet Musa, especially with Pharaoh, the magicians and the Children of Israel. Through a descriptive-analytical approach integrating classical exegesis and modern theories of social movements, this research uncovers a multidimensional model of da'wah, involving psychological fortitude, intellectual argument and linguistic gentleness (qawlan layyina). Today, the global Ummah contends with New Atheism, extreme materialism and cyber-disinformation. This study concludes that Prophet Musa's strategy of addressing the "God-complex" of his era by appealing to cosmic evidence and rational argumentation offers a crucial lesson for contemporary da'ees. The research finds that a successful modern da'wah strategy should combine spiritual and empirical knowledge with flexible technology, in line with the Mosaic model of miracles (signs) and rational discourse.
Downloads
References
1. Fadli, Muhamad Aroka, Ahmad Sarbini, Engkos Kosasih, and Badruzzaman M. Yunus. “The Story of the Prophet Moses and the Phasraoh in the Qur'an: An Analysis of the Implementation of Structural Da'wah.” Hanifiya: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama 7, no. 1 (2024): 223–232.
https://doi.org/10.15575/hanifiya.v7i2.37949.
2.Muslih, Mohammad Kholid, Miqdad Hamid Al Anshory, and Aldy Pradhana.
“Rethinking the God of the Gaps Argument: An Islamic Philosophical Critique of New Atheism.” Jurnal Theologia 36, no. 1 (2024): 35–50. https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2025.36.1.25497
3۔ابن کثیر، البدایہ والنہایہ، عماد الدين، أبو الفداء، إسماعيل بن عمر بن كثير القرشي الدمشقي دار الکتب العلمیہ، بیروت ،ج 1، ص1203
https://ar.wikisource.org/wiki/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%A9_%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%A9/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%B2%D8%A1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%88%D9%84/%D9%82%D8%B5%D8%A9_%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B3%D9%89_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%85 https://www.hodaalquran.com/article/4179
https://mail.hamdardislamicus.com.pk/index.php/hi/article/download/1346/413
4. Al-Qurtubi, Abu ‘Abdullah Muhammad ibn Ahmad. Al-Jami‘ li-Ahkam al-Qur’an. Commentary on Surah Al-Qasas 28:7. King Saud University Electronic Mushaf. (accessed April 25, 2026). https://quran.ksu.edu.sa/tafseer/qortobi/sura28-aya7.html
https://darulifta-deoband.com/home/ur/history-biography/6573
5۔القرآن الکریم، 4/164(تفسیرسورہ النساء)۔ ابن کثیر ، عماد الدين، أبو الفداء، إسماعيل بن عمر بن كثير ، تفسیر القرآن العظیم،بیروت: دار الکتب العلمیہ، 1419ھ ج2، ص401
https://quran.com/ur/4:164/tafsirs/tafseer-ibn-e-kaseer-urdu
6۔عثمانی ،مفتی محمد شفیع ،معارف القرآن،ادارہ المعارف، ج6،ص93
https://tafsir.app/tabari/28/27
7۔ عثمانی مفتی محمد تقی،آسان ترجمہ قرآن ،مکتبہ معارف القرآن کراچی ، ج2،ص1169
8۔ایضا
9. Al-Shboul, Ali, and Omar Mohammad-Ameen Ahmad Hazaymeh. “The Philosophy of Conflict and Political Dialogue in the Holy Qur’an: The Moses (A.S.)–Pharaoh Narrative in Historical Context and Contemporary Relevance.” Hamdard Islamicus 49, no. 1 https://doi.org/10.57144/hi.v49i1.1346
https://quran.com/ur/26:10/tafsirs/tafsir-fe-zalul-quran-syed-qatab
۔ طہٰ: 20/2510
11. Farooqi, Sadaf. “Prophet Musa and Pharaoh: Psychological Human Behavior Faced by a Caller to Islam.” Sadaf’s Space: From Blog to Books, January 1, 2012. https://sadaffarooqi.com/2012/01/01/prophet-musa-and-pharaoh-
۔طہٰ ٰ: 20 /4912
50/20:ٰ ۔طہٰ13
14.Al-Shboul, Ali, and Omar Mohammad-Ameen Ahmad Hazaymeh. “The Philosophy of Conflict and Political Dialogue in the Holy Qur’an: The Moses (A.S.)–Pharaoh Narrative in Historical Context and Contemporary Relevance.” Hamdard Islamicus 49, no. 1.https://doi.org/10.57144/hi.v49i1.1346
https://misbah.info/misbah/qesasalanbiyah/musa-nabias-in-pharaohs-court/
15۔طٰہٰ:20/51
16. Humble, Muhammad Tim. The Methodology of the Prophets in Da‘wah, Part 2: Study Guide. Al Hidaayah, February 2024. PDF. https://alhidaayah.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/The-Methodology-of-the-Prophets-Part-2-_-Study-Guide.pdf.
17.Al Mosa, S. M. A. . (2023). Pharaoh’s Argumentative Conversational Fallacies with Moses, peace be upon him, in Quranic Stories. Arts for Linguistic & Literary Studies, 5(1), 1-122. https://doi.org/10.53286/arts.v5i1.1438
18. Learn Islam. Class 9: Prophet Musa (A.S.) (Contd.). April 2023. PDF. https://learn-islam.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Class-9-Prophet-Musa-A.S.-Contd.pdf.
19۔طہٰٰٰٰ: 20/66
20۔طہٰٰٰٰ: 20/68
21۔عثمانی،مفتی محمد تقی ،آسان ترجمۂ قرآن، ج 2،ص 965
22۔طہٰٰٰ: 20/70
23. Hadith of the Day. “Prophet Musa (AS) – Part III.” Hadith of the Day, May 14, 2025. Accessed April 26, 2026. https://hadithoftheday.com/prophet-musa-as-part-iii/.
24. Al-Sarhani, Aesha Yousuf Ibrahim, Thabet Ahmed Abu-Alhaj, and Selamat bin Amir. “Atheism in Contemporary Arab Societies: Motives, Effects, and Remedial Approaches—An Analytical Study in Light of the Qur’an.” Architectural Image Studies 7, no. 1 (January 2026): 1251–1264. https://doi.org/10.62754/ais.v7i1.1009
25. Rashid, Aasia, and Ume Farva. “Factors of Atheism as a Challenge to Effective Da’wah: An Analysis and Strategies for Their Solution in Contemporary Era.” International Research Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies (IRJAIS) 4, no. 1 (January–June 2024): 24–35. https://irjais.com/index.php/irjais/article/view/123/97.
Muslih, Mohammad Kholid, Miqdad Hamid al Anshory, and Aldy Pradhana. “Rethinking the God of the Gaps Argument: An Islamic Philosophical Critique of New Atheism.” Jurnal Theologia 36, no. 1 (2025): 35–50. https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2025.36.1.25497
26۔ طٰہٰ 20/50
27. SurahQuran.com. “Surah Ta-Ha (20:50) Tafsir Urdu.” https://surahquran.com/tafsir-Urdu-aya-50-sora-20.html.
28. Zainab, Siti, Nor Muslim, and Abdul Azis. “Da’wa Practices and Its Challenges in Contemporary Era (Case Study in Kotawaringin Timur Regency, Indonesia).” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 2, no. 2 (2019): 34–48. https://scispace.com/pdf/da-wa-practices-and-its-challenges-in-contemporary-era-case-45op494on0.pdfs
29. Al Kahfi, Muhammad Firdaus, and M. Yaqub. “Problems and Dynamics of Thought of Da’wah Institutions: Between Islamization and Secularization.” Hadara: Journal of Da’wah and Islamic Civilization 1, no. 2 (2025): 98–120. https://hadara.crjis.com/index.php/hrjdi/article/download/14/7.
30.Agusman, A., & Samsuddin, S. (2024). Strategi Dakwah Nabi Musa: The Da’wah Strategy of Prophet Musa. DIRASAH: Jurnal Kajian Islam, 1(2), 115–131. Retrieved from https://litera-academica.com/ojs/dirasah/article/view/10
Yuwono, Ardi Tri, Andi Sebastian, Haru Rahman, Amir Chung-Hee, and Abdullah Chen. “Challenges and Development of Contemporary Islamic Da‘wah in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.” Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah 45, no. 1 (2025): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.21580/jid.v45.1.26253.
31. Qur’an. “Al-A‘raf 7:104–105.” Quran.com. https://quran.com/7/104-105
32. Al-Hajri, Rashid bin Muhammad bin Futais. Jawamiʿ al-Kalim. Translated by Muhammad Isa. Bahrain: Maʿhad Jamiʿ Isa bin Salman lil-Dirasat al-Islamiyyah, 2022. Kitab o Sunnat Library.
33. Hansen, Hans V. “Fallacies.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. First published May 29, 2015; substantive revision August 30, 2024. Edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Stanford University, 2024. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/fallacies
34. Al-Ṭabarī, Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. “Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī on Qur’an 20:59.” King Saud University Electronic Moshaf Project. Archived August 14, 2017. Accessed via Internet Archive. https://web.archive.org/web/20170814172258/http://quran.ksu.edu.sa/tafseer/tabary/sura20-aya59.html
Ibn Kathīr, Ismāʿīl ibn ʿUmar. “Tafsīr Ibn Kathīr on Surah Ṭāhā (20:59).” King Saud University Quran Tafsir Project. Archived August 28, 2017. Accessed via Internet Archive. https://web.archive.org/web/20170828104827/http://quran.ksu.edu.sa/tafseer/katheer/sura20-aya59.html.
35. Author(s). “Title of the Article.” Proceeding International Seminar on Islamic Studies (INSIS) 6, no. 1 (February 2024). Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara. PDF. INSIS Proceedings PDF
Author(s). “Title of the Article.” AL-AFKAR: Journal for Islamic Studies 7, no. 2 (2024): page range. https://doi.org/[DOI if available].
36. Ambali, Hamad. “Islamic Da’wah Methodologies and The Challenges Facing Da’wah in The Contemporary Society.” Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies 3, no. 2 (2025): 50–60. https://doi.org/10.58723/ijfis.v3i2.426.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kanwar Muhammad Akif (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
KJMR publishes all articles as open access under CC BY 4.0, allowing anyone to share and adapt the work, even commercially, with proper credit, a license link, and clear notice of changes, without implying endorsement. Authors retain copyright while granting the journal non-exclusive publishing and archiving rights and may self-archive without embargo. Third-party material requires proper permission, and the journal ensures long-term free access through its website and archiving partners.
How to Cite
