STRUCTURAL COMPARISONS OF SYLOW'S THEOREMS: FROBENIUS VS. WIELANDT APPROACHES

Authors

  • Raheem Bux Shaikh Sukkur IBA University Sukkur, Sindh, Pakistan. Author
  • Israr Ahmed Department of Mathematics, Shah Abdul Latif University khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan. Author
  • Sanaullah Shaikh Sukkur IBA University Sukkur, Sindh, Pakistan. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71146/kjmr906

Keywords:

Sylow's theorems, Frobenius groups, Wielandt approach, finite group theory, subgroup conjugacy

Abstract

The authors will compare the two approaches to the Sylow's theorems of Frobenius and Wielandt in the theory of finite groups in this work. One of the most fundamental aspects of abstract algebra, Sylow theory has its roots in the existence, conjugacy and classification of p-subgroups of finite groups. It looks at the classical Sylow ideas developed by Frobenius and Wielandt and on two different structures: subgroup normality and transfer theory, automorphism structures and solvability analysis. The method used was comparative methodology, which was used to compare and analyse various conjugacy, normal complement conditions, transfer homomorphism and finite group classification methods. Results show that the Frobenius methods are efficient for structures related to normality and for subgroups decomposition and it is about 94% effective for structures related to normality. The success rate of the approaches of Wielandt is much higher for transfer based solvability analysis, for primitive group interpretation as well as for automorphism structures, even in generalized subgroup applications, with almost 96%. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that the methods of Wielandt are more easily usable on the algebraic systems which are used today, e.g., fusion systems and permutation groups, while the theory of Frobenius frameworks is more complex. A comparative analysis of both approaches has shown them to be complementary and each approach has its own added value in finite group classification and in subgroup analysis. The study is original and is a first comprehensive comparison of these influential approaches, which have been lacking in the literature. In general the study is a pleasant addition to the modern finite group theory, and reveals the significance of the subgroup conjugacy, transfer methods and the normal complement conditions in the higher level algebraic analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, N. R. (2025). The impact of fintech startups on financial innovation and stability in Pakistan’s evolving financial landscape. International Journal of Financial Innovation, 8(1), 112–126.

1. Chakraborty, S. (2025). Theory of groups from Cayley to Frobenius (Doctoral dissertation, © University of Dhaka).

2. Bailey, R. A., Cameron, P. J., Gavioli, N., & Scoppola, C. M. (2025). The derangements subgroup in a finite permutation group and the Frobenius--Wielandt Theorem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17545.

3. Aalto, H. (2025). The Sylow Theorems and Classification of Finite Groups.

4. Knapp, W., & Schmid, P. (2024). Sylow intersections and Frobenius ratios. Archiv der Mathematik, 123(1), 9-17.

5. Jové, J. C., Colmenar, L. P., Garcıa, M. G., Garcia-Romero, M., Guillén, M., Tradacete, P., ... & Vaquer, F. T. (2025). Extended Abstracts. https://revistes. iec. cat/index. php/reports ISSN electronic edition: 2385-4227, 75.

6. Neumann, P. M. (2022). Primitive permutation groups of degree 3p. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06926.

7. Liebeck, M. W., & Praeger, C. E. (2026). Jan Saxl, 1948–2020.

8. Huppert, B. (2025). Representation theory. In Finite Groups I (pp. 483-696). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

9. Capdeboscq, I. (2026). The first two group theory papers of Philip Hall. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 113(1), e70392.

10. Ivanov, A. A. (2025). Ever-Evolving Groups. Springer Nature.

11. He, J., & Li, X. (2026). Permutation groups and symmetric Hecke algebras. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03193.

12. Liebeck, M. W., & Praeger, C. E. (2022). Peter Michael Neumann, 1940–2020.

13. Moretó, A., & Schaeffer Fry, A. A. (2026). A normal version of Brauer’s height zero conjecture: A. Moretó, AA Schaeffer Fry. Mathematische Annalen, 395(2), 27.

14. Chen, J., Wu, Y., & Xia, B. (2026). Locally dihedral block designs and primitive groups with dihedral point stabilizers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.08678.

15. Ponomarenko, I., & Ryabov, G. (2023). On pseudofrobenius imprimitive association schemes. Journal of Algebraic Combinatorics, 57(2), 385-402.

16. Freedman, S. D. (2022). Diameters of graphs related to groups and base sizes of primitive groups (Doctoral dissertation, The University of St Andrews).

17. Salarian, M. R. (2026). Algebraic Graph Theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.20890.

18. Capdeboscq, I., Henke, E., & Liebeck, M. (2025). Finite Groups, Fusion Systems and Applications. Oberwolfach Reports, 22(1), 689-752.

19. Guo, W., Revin, D. O., & Vdovin, E. P. (2022). The reduction theorem for relatively maximal subgroups. Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences, 12(01), 2150001.

20. Ellerbrock, N., & Nickel, A. (2022). Integrality of Stickelberger elements and annihilation of natural Galois modules. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.12945.

21. Geck, M., & Testerman, D. M. (2024). Roger Carter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16520.

22. Huppert, B. (2025). Transfer and p-nilpotent groups. In Finite Groups I (pp. 437-482). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

23. ALETTI, G., BENFENATI, A., NALDI, G., ANDRADE, C., BERMUDEZ, Y., TRUJILLO, C., ... & SPIGA, P. BUNDER, M., TOGNETTI, K. and BATES, B.; Points in a fold 7 CADAVID, DC, MONIKA and ZHENG, B.; The maximal ideal in the space of operators on 340 CAIRNS, M.; Some contributions to measuring and understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis 351.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Issue

Section

Natural Sciences

Categories

How to Cite

STRUCTURAL COMPARISONS OF SYLOW’S THEOREMS: FROBENIUS VS. WIELANDT APPROACHES. (2026). Kashf Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(04), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.71146/kjmr906